Staff Blogs

Posts by Numetrick

Twitter is a fad!February 27, 2009 by Numetrick

Recently I was in a meeting where somebody said twitter was a fad, that it will die and people WILL get bored. I guess there are no write or wrong answers to a statement like that, maybe the bird will tip off its perch, who knows!

What I am sure about is the new trend in communication Twitter has spawned. Twitter is the utility which has brought life-streaming and microblogging into the mainstream (before it was just the nerds). If people do move on from Twitter, they will only be moving onto more sophisticated or integrated life-streaming platforms.

Back to that original statement.

I’m sure there are many of you out there who hear and think the same thing, take a lookie at the video above from TED, perhaps it will change your mind about usefulness of Twitter, life-streaming and microblogging.

Similar ramblings:

Read more

Well hello Mr President!February 25, 2009 by Numetrick

obamarama

Another fake we think, we’re not convinced by the tiny amount of followers.

Btw: As Gary V would say “This is the thunder post!”, post 100 people.

Similar ramblings:

Read more

People powered search vs. Algorithm powered searchFebruary 22, 2009 by Numetrick

For quite some time I have been sanity checking some of my searches in delicious. Basically everytime I do a search in Google, I replicate it in Delicious.

I’ve been trying to see which of the two provide me with the most accurate search results, across a variety of search terms.

Google launching Search Wiki is a sign that they might, in the future, incorporate reoccurring trends from self-organised SERPs to influence their overall ranking algorithm.

There are quite a few self organised search engines on the web such as Wikia Search, and of course Delicious, which isn’t a search engine as such, but does provide folksonomy driven search results.

So here are some of my recent search queries (extracted from my Google Account):

“gap liberty shirt”
“fabric live 44”
“Chase and status”
“5D mkII equivalent”
“free enterprise wiki”
“volvo v70 diesel”
“SRAW”
“italian chef gennaro”

I queried all three of the terms above and compared results between Wikia Search, Google and Delicious. To keep things fair I only analysed the first 10 results I was delivered and I compared the positions at which I was delivered the most accurate information.

In my Daytum account I started to give a point to each service which gave me the best search results:

chart

So as my little test shows, Google is still the search daddy and we’re still some way off people powered search catching up. Will it ever catch up? I’m not quite sure, what am I sure about is that when I have found information through Delicious it has been very accurate indeed.

What am I getting at?

The small sets of search results, which have been organised by groups of people deliver real value. If the information is valuable to me, it must be valuable to the all mighty search powers. I strongly believe that in the near future we will see algorithm based search engines use this information in some way to improve the information users get delivered.

Whilst results are relative according to what information an individual may or may not find useful, it would be good to see more extensive (and accurate) tests and results.

Similar ramblings:

Read more

Navigation NavigatonFebruary 21, 2009 by Numetrick

The SEO vs. Design vs. UE vs. Tech debates still carry on, however, I do learn some cool things as a result of them. A colleague of mine pointed out some good examples of user friendly navigation on two popular websites, shown below are grabs from Ikea and Times-Online.

ikea

times

Similar ramblings:

Read more

Bad TerminologyFebruary 18, 2009 by Numetrick

Lot’s of talk in the SEO world about “link-bait”, basically great content which increases the amount of relevant, keyword-rich links that point back to your domain or specific landing pages.

I don’t like the term “link-bait’ it makes people in the SEO business sound like snake oil salesman. Good links are important don’t get me wrong; however, there are lots of ethical ways to increase the amount of links a domain has, take for example: On-line PR and strategical use of social media.

Both of the mentioned activities require generating great content and good ideas, which capture peoples interests and deliver value to them in some way.

Sounds pretty straightforward doesn’t it? So why on earth do SEO’s keep using words such as “bait” in their terminology? You’re not setting up a trap or doing anything underhand!

May be SEO’s will loose their grey image once they stop using bad terminology, and start talking about what’s required to gain good links and rankings: amazing, well produced content, that is to easy crawl and index.

Search is, and will always be a pull medium, active prospects looking for something - be it information, products or entertainment. Good, ethical SEO’s will always analyse what people are searching for and then advise their clients about the best ways to deliver that content.

Delivering competition beating content requires going one step further and getting creative with content.

I am personally starting to see a lot of content on the web, which is highly linkable, yet hasn’t been put together with SEO in mind. Take for example all the data visualisation concepts that have recently appeared.

If you analyze their back link portfolios you start to see the amount of links they receive. Again no SEO magic going on, just a great ideas that people have linked back to naturally. Based on this observation I think all valuable keywords, especially head keywords should have great ideas built around them.

Similar ramblings:

Read more

Bragging designFebruary 16, 2009 by Numetrick

brag3

Brag ‘n’ dare community website Bragster has a cool homepage feature, little translucent dialogue boxes that pop up to let visitors know about conversations happening inside. You can’t come in though, you have to become a member, very clever me thinks.

Similar ramblings:

Read more

Web MapFebruary 4, 2009 by Numetrick

ia_japan

More Geek Chic from me, this time it comes in the form of this cool wallpaper designed by IA Japan. You can download it or order it as a poster for your office.

Similar ramblings:

Read more

Shirky @ the ICAFebruary 4, 2009 by Numetrick

I went to see Clay Shirky at the ICA today, it’s always good to listen to him speak about all things collaboration and social media.

I’ll spare all the finer points of his seminar as I don’t want to turn this into another collaboration/social meeja blog post.

If you haven’t heard him speak before, it’s worth tuning into him @poptech.

All things said, one of my favourite quotes from his talk was “fall fast, learn quick”. The quote was referring to a process a lot of organisations go through when embracing online collaboration, messing up quickly and learning from cock-ups just as fast.

His book: Here Comes Everybody, is on my pile of things to read.

(excuse the poor quality pic, I had to crank up my ISO to avoid blur)

Similar ramblings:

Read more

Tru-ThoughtsFebruary 2, 2009 by Numetrick

I’ve become a massive fan of Brighton based record label Tru-Thoughts. All tracks can be bagged from etchshop.co.uk and I thoroughly recommend the shapes compilations.

tru_thoughts

Hectic!

Random Posts

Read more

“Collaboration starts internally”February 1, 2009 by Numetrick

I’ve recently been helping a number of clients get to grips to social meeja whilst simultaneously developing their social strategies. I often notice that people, departments, and organisations in general are not social internally, yet they still expect to build deeper relationships with strangers on the web.

Funny that isn’t it?

My role in these situations often varies and I find myself turning into a management consultant as opposed to an ad/markerting-whatever bod.

Different people in different organisational departments posses different types of useful knowledge. The knowledge different individuals posses is holistically valuable to brands that are trying to utilise social media.

Think of product specialists replying to comments made about specific products within the blogosphere…you get the idea.

People need to collaborate and share knowledge internally and different people, with different types of knowledge and expertise should be taken into account when devising social strategies.

I often feel like taking clients out on team building days, giving them a chance to hold hands, sing songs around campfires and build twine rafts.

Comic courtesy of @socialsignal

Unfortunately I don’t think finance on either side would be too happy, wink. I am therefore left to consider ways in which information, assets and relevant people in businesses can collaborate more efficiently in order to utilise social media more effectivley.

I hate using jargon and buzzwords, they are toss; however, when I’m thrown into situations where I am required to get people collaborating internally, I’m left to investigate “Enterprise 2” tools.

Sorry that’s the last time I use that word.

There are a myriad of paid and open source tools available, which all pretty much serve the same purpose, facilitating internal collaboration, dialogue and exchanges of information. Unfortunately tools alone do not solve internal collaboration problems and most the important things to consider are people, their attitudes and management culture. You can give a person a thousand tools and they still will not become collaborative, social individuals.

Making internal collaboration initiatives effective requires understanding people, their day to day work, and speaking to their seniors in order to ensure that they’re given ample opportunities to contribute to their brands/businesses’ social media initiatives.

Whilst there is a lot of talk about collaboration and engagement, it is increasingly important to understand organisational culture towards internal collaboration before concocting elaborate social media strategies.

Enough said, that was boring.

Similar ramblings:

Read more
1 2 3 4 5 > »
Work by client:
Work by service:
Work by sector:
People:
Insight: